The conclusion of Peter’s first letter to the church is
marked by only 3 verses. Generally after
having made our in-depth study of the preceding 5 chapters and many verses, we
would briefly read the last 3 and surmise this was an excellent overall volume
of work Peter wrote for the church. The
last 3 verses are after all, merely an epilogue, a sort of administrative
formality of who helped Peter write this work, and general set of announcements
or news he wished to share. It would
appear at first, as though there is not too much “meat” written or intended in
the last few verses. But what if a
second look, determined there was something more there than first meets the
eye What if, even in what seems fairly
routine, are buried a few more nuggets of truth for us to discover?
Peter wraps up his first letter to the church in verse 12
saying … “By Silvanus, a faithful brother unto you, as I suppose, I have
written briefly, exhorting, and testifying that this is the true grace of God
wherein ye stand.” First, lest we think
there was any tension between Peter and Paul over the spreading of the gospel
outside of the predominantly Jewish community, it had ceased. This letter was addressed to the church in
Asia Minor, obviously composed of non-Jewish converts. Second, consider that Peter references
Silvanus otherwise called Silas as a faithful brother. Paul, Silas, and Timothy were often working
together to open new churches across southern Europe from Rome through Greece,
Turkey, and the Northern areas of the Middle East. Here Peter is recognizing the ministry of
Paul, and of Silas as being faithful to the church. He is endorsing what they say. Peter states that this ministry is “the true
grace of God wherein ye stand”.
This endorsement is important in two contexts. First, Peter equates his own ministry with
that of Paul and Silas as being equal in truth and importance. Peter is not asserting his right to authorize
the work of another, only that he is stating his agreement with that
ministry. Some Christian’s assert that
Peter was the leader of the disciples after Christ ascended back to heaven, and
that somehow there was an immediate hierarchy within the church. There was not. Peter has just spent the last five chapters
of this letter affirming how leadership responsibilities belong to “Elders” of
which he counts himself. Leadership was
not supposed to be centered only in pastors, or bishops, or priests – of which,
none of these terms are ever used by Peter in this text to discuss himself or
other leaders of Christianity. Peter in
this final epilogue is stating his unity with the ministry of Silas, Paul, and
Timothy.
Second, Peter is showing his close contact and coordination
with the work of Paul and Silas as being in partnership for the cause of
Christ. There is a unity in the mission
of the disciples and apostles of Christianity in spreading the gospel. There is no competition between Peter and
Paul, there is partnership. Just because
2 great personalities, 2 great elders, have a different perspective on Christ,
and different talents in the cause of God, does not mean there is no
unity. Rather, the work of Christ is
enhanced by employing the varied skills of 2 servants, not attempting to make
them both the same. Some Christians
assume, that to be effective in the cause of Christ, they must learn to become
great speakers, or great writers, or great missionaries. But this is not true. It is not what you must become to be
effective in His cause; it is to allow Him to use what you already are. Your differences, your unique perspective, is
what lends you to be effective in His cause.
There can be partnership and unity within the church without the use of
cloning. We need not be exactly alike,
or equally skilled. Instead we need to
be fully willing to be used, and appreciative of the differences of others and
what their value is to the church as well as our own.
The goal of the viral church is to appreciate the
differences between us, while being united in the goal of spreading a living
salvation experience. This means
however, that our own experience is not “THE” roadmap to God, it is merely
“our” individual roadmap. Each person
surrenders to Christ, and each is saved by Christ. But this is not a cookie cutter approach
where one size fits all. It is an
individual approach where the grace of God reaches one soul at a time. Just because Christ frees you from some
particular sin first, does not mean he frees everyone of that sin first. Where you may be unburdened by something,
does not mean your brother is there yet.
Perhaps his journey will be longer.
It is not your job to rush a process in him that you see completed in
yourself. It is your job to love him
through his own process, and be there for him, to encourage him on his journey
of surrender. YOU do not decide his
timeline of surrender. You can only work
on your own. Let Christ do the work of
removing sin in others. Let yourself
become a vessel through which the love of Christ reaches others and motivates
them to seek a change in the first place.
Our Godhead is united in purpose, but they are not a
singular entity. They are three
entities, distinct in personality, attributes, and skills and abilities. God the Father, God the Son, and the Holy
Spirit are not the same person, but they are in perfect unity. We too can be Christian brothers, and when
our love for others replaces love for self, we can find ourselves in perfect
unity for His cause and not our own.
This state of unity, like the work of Peter and Paul, allows us to leverage
our talents for His cause. Peter was not
much of a writer in comparison with the works of Paul. But this did not deter the cause of Christ
from benefiting from what each did. Paul
was probably not as passionate a speaker as Peter was, but his logical style
and lawyer like tendencies were also employed in the cause of Christ. Both men were united in love for others. This was the “true grace” that Peter refers
to.
Peter continues his epilogue in verse 13 writing … “The church
that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you; and so
doth Marcus my son.” First, Peter
identifies a church that is at “Babylon”.
Peter is not speaking of the literal city of Babylon, long since
destroyed in wars. However this
designation gives an immediate prophetic context to the writings of Peter’s
other partner in the cause of Christ, namely those of John and his book of
Revelations of Jesus Christ. John writes
of several prophecies where the usage of Babylon is cited. In this context Peter implies that the church
at Babylon is the singular light in the darkness of the capital of the world at
that time … Rome. This does not imply
that Babylon would remain designated to Rome and never move again, it does
however signify that Rome was the capital of power in his day, and that the
church at Babylon would be the church at this capital. Rome would remain Babylon in this context for
quite a long time. This designation
however, would make even more sense, as we see the state of the decay of the
church that moves from the symbolism of a white horse of purity, to a ghost
horse of death.
Next you will note that the church was “elected together”
with you. This could have two meaning
for us. First, it could mean that the
work of perfection or of being made elect, righteous, and upright is being
accomplished in the church at Rome, the same way it is being accomplished
everywhere else in the world at this time or any other; through the surrender
of its members to the power of Jesus Christ.
In this sense, Peter is stating that the location of the church is not
the determining factor in its success in the cause of Christ, it is the state
of surrender that determines that.
Location does not deter the cause of God. The church can thrive in “sin city” just as
well as anywhere else, if its members are willing to surrender to Christ and
lean on His strength instead of their own.
Second, the idea of “elected” could refer to a democratic ideology
within the governing structure of the church.
That is to say, that the members elect or vote to determine the roles of
elder, or care-giver, or teacher within the body based on a collective view or
consensus on the skills of their various members. In either context, the ideas of equality of
the work of Christ are not made better or worse based on the location of where
the church resides. Nor does a church
get to assert prominence based on location.
Lastly, in this passage, Peter refers to the great love he
has for his co-worker Marcus, or Mark.
It will be Mark who writes a gospel of Jesus Christ from the experiences
Peter will share with him. It is this
clue that sets our path to study the writings of Peter through the gospel of
Mark in our studies. But also important
here is that Peter once again expresses a level of unity with yet another elder
in the early church. Peter goes so far
as to call Mark “his son”. Given his own
education and writing skills, it may well have been Mark who actually wrote
this letter on behalf of Peter. Peter
dictates what to say, Mark transcribes it in written form. This may also have been the method used in
writing the gospel book we will study later.
In any case, unity in the cause of Christ remains a paramount idea in
the mind of Peter. He continues to
identify himself as partner with these other early church leaders, not as sole
leader or head of the church to which all other authorities must submit. The only “sole” authority we are to submit to
within the church and our lives, remains Jesus Christ.
Peter concludes his first book, and this epilogue in verse
14 writing … “Greet ye one another with a kiss of charity. Peace be with you
all that are in Christ Jesus. Amen.” To
greet each other with a kiss of charity is to express for each other a level of
intimacy within the cause of Christ.
Physical contact of any kind grows rarer in the age of the internet and
trend to isolationism. We spend more
time in front of our screens, and less time in front of each other. As such we become more reserved with each other. Whether in fear of germs that now run
rampant, or just in fear of over-asserting our affections, we abstain from
intimate contact. How many a young boy
will have cited this text to a young girl in hopes of obtaining that first
kiss? But Peter was not offering advice
for those attempting to date. This was
not a kiss of passion, or affection, it was of charity. Charity is a gift we do not deserve, and
implies more pity than passion.
Forgetting who we are attracted to, and offering a kiss to ANY in the
membership of our Christian ranks, is to express a level of intimacy within the
family of Christ.
Peter does not say we should kiss each other on the lips,
nor does he preclude it. But before we
get all excited, remember you would be kissing your child, your mother, your
father, and a stranger unknown to you in this same manner of charity. I would guess the practice of kissing each
other on the cheeks during a greeting may have been derived from this
passage. The message behind it however,
has even more meaning in our day than it did in Peter’s. Peter and his compatriots did not suffer from
the burden of modern technology and the isolation which it tends to
foster. Peter and his viral church were
out there “in real life”. They did not
spend hours in front of a screen whether behind the internet, or the TV, or the
movie theatre. They were far more
physically engaged with each other than we have become. But expressions of affection and intimacy
among the members of our church are no less important today than they were back
then, in fact now it is a higher importance.
If the viral church is to battle the social norms, perhaps
we should begin with increasing our time “in real life” and with acts of
affection for our fellow members of the body.
Perhaps those to whom this idea is foreign could begin with warm
handshakes when they encounter others.
Or perhaps to those who are farther along in the journey, an unsolicited
hug might be just the thing another needs.
Or perhaps to those who are yet farther on the journey to loving others,
a kiss of charity. But perhaps even more
important for those yet farther down the road to perfection, is a sustained,
prolonged, deep and caring interest in the life of another, that will NOT rest,
until that life has every evidence of the love it needs to survive and thrive
in this world, while we have means to achieve it, and even when we do not. That was the passion of our Christ, and He
longs to reflect through us to each other and to the world so in need of His
love.
The final thought of Peter was to bless us and wish for us
all, the Peace of Jesus Christ. Peace
brings a state of mind that is free from the concerns of war, or threats
against our security, and worry over our survival. To find His Peace, is to fully put our trust
in Him, understanding He looks out for our higher priorities, and that the
cares of this world are nothing in the context of His plans for eternity. Life, death, health, safety … none of these
things can be truly comprehended with a mortal view of them. They can only be truly comprehended in the
light of eternity He longs to bring us.
If we are to have His peace, we must learn to trust Him with ALL our
cares. In this way, we free ourselves
from them. In this way, we learn to
trust Him even more. In this way, we
come to recognize, we were never in control, and that resting in Him is the
only path to real and lasting Peace, no matter what our earthly situations
attempt to dictate to us. His peace
cannot be taken away by this world. For
His peace is eternal, and the gift He longs to bring to us all.
Thus concludes Peter’s first letter to the church and this
epilogue. Perhaps the secret to
uncovering even more truth is to not only have second look at passages like
these, but a third, and fourth, and a never ending study …