Ever had anyone offer you “their two cents worth”? They offer you nothing more than their
opinion, with the caveat that it may not be worth much. On the other hand, a soldier who dies in
combat defending his country is said to have given his last ounce of courage or
his last measure of devotion. This
sacrifice is the most any one could ever offer, and none of us would dare
equate it to only the value of two pennies.
But what if everything you had to offer, your entire last measure of
devotion, was literally only worth two pennies?
If that was the case, our first response would be to judge you as
extremely poor. If everything you owned,
and everything you earned, had only amounted to two pennies, you would truly be
the poorest of the poor. If we
encountered such a person, meaning if any of “us”, encountered such a person,
we should all of us, be able to help them out somehow. No matter how much any of “us” are in need
financially ourselves, all of us can muster more than two pennies. And yet this paradox is only just beginning.
We all know the story.
We have all been embarrassed by it.
We all measure ourselves by comparison and find that our own last
measure of devotion has yet to ever be offered.
We call ourselves Christians, but few have ever faced the ultimate test,
are we willing to give our lives for our beliefs. Yet one poor widow, tucked away at the end of
an eventful chapter in the Gospel of Mark, gave hers. Peter could easily have skipped this
story. If he had, it would simply have
gone down as one of the countless things Christ did or said that were never
recorded in scriptures. None of us would
ever know anything about the poor widow.
None of us would feel cheated from this omission, from our lack of knowledge. In fact, most of us might feel better about
ourselves, at least about what we have given for His cause. But Peter remembered the story. Perhaps because the Holy Spirit, who inspires
us all, remembered the story, and did not wish to see this widow disappear into
oblivion unnoticed.
So it would be recorded.
Perhaps it is worthy of our second look, as John Mark records, picking
up in verse 41 saying … “And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld
how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in
much.” Motives matter. But talk about a high pressure sale. Jesus moved within the Temple where He had
been teaching and preaching over against the treasury. This was the offertory box, or safe, or
collection mechanism of His day. In
short, people brought what they intended to give, and cast it into the
box. Money falling in on money, silver
and gold, falling on silver and gold, would make noise. But then, that is the point of public giving,
to make noise, to be noticed as you give.
What other purpose to giving in public, where it can be noticed, where
it is to be sure it is noticed.
Add to this spectacle, that Jesus moves near the box. Ever had the preacher, also pass the plate
for offerings, directly to you? Kinda
hard to avoid giving something, when the leader of your church passes you the
plate, one on one. This may have been an
inadvertent pressure caused by having Christ, right next to the collection
box. People like the Sanhedrin, would
want to publicly embarrass Jesus, by putting large sums of money in the
box. By comparison Jesus had nothing to
give, He was not rich. So the Sanhedrin
members could put huge sums of money in the box, they would simply redistribute
the funds later anyway, so it was for nothing but show. The Sanhedrin were declaring by their rich
gifts, that the favor of God was obviously upon them. If Christ had nothing to give, and was so
poor, perhaps He was not favored or loved by God.
Others, those who followed Christ, might have felt compelled
to put something in, while Jesus watched.
This was their way of “showing” Jesus that they were His followers. Once Jesus saw them throw in money, they
could rest, and relax, knowing that Jesus saw their one good deed. That one good financial act, might actually
“buy” them enough good will to last the rest of their lives. A one-and-done version of buying salvation,
and if you think about it, no price was too high for that one. So while they were not trying to embarrass
Christ by comparison, they were in fact embarrassing themselves, by withholding
their hearts and attempting only to pacify their Lord with coin He did not
want. Their hearts that Jesus truly
wanted, would go nowhere near the collection plate.
Commerce continued.
And Peter continues his recollection in verse 42 saying … “And there
came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.” I am unfamiliar with exactly how the currency
exchange would work out between this widow in the day of Christ, and our
current American dollars. Therefore, I
imagine her gift to be two pennies. But
I do believe her gift to be miniscule by comparison with the other patrons of
the Temple. The reaction of the
disciples bears this out. But here is
where the paradox begins. Motives
matter. She did not give to impress; the
lack of quantity would see to that. She
did not give to garner the attention of her Lord, in order to buy His
goodwill. Her lack of funds would surely
have prevented that; it was simply too little.
So instead, she gave seeking anonymity.
And Peter through the Holy Spirit continued to grant her some. Even now we do not know her name, or anything
about her story after this. She could
have been someone famous in the church later, or someone who never joined the
faith. We do not know. We do have insight into her motives, and they
were nothing like the others around her.
John Mark records the response of Jesus in verse 43 saying …
“And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto
you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into
the treasury:” Jesus does not make a
spectacle. He quietly calls over His
disciples to Him, and with a lowered voice He points out the widow and her
gift. He then proclaims something that
makes no sense at first. Monetarily it
will never make any sense. Bookkeepers
and Accountants do not value two pennies as much as they do two hundred
dollars. So the facts of what she gave
can never be more than her contemporaries.
She was poor after all. In fact,
she was extremely poor. The other donors
in the Temple might have done better to help her out, as nearly everyone had
more money than her. But Jesus takes
care not to call unwanted attention to disrupt her anonymity. He handles this quietly, but purposely.
Jesus continues in verse 44 saying … “For all they did cast
in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even
all her living.” The paradox
explodes. Her entire living, all that
she had in this world was the two pennies.
She was poor, extremely poor. But
she gave it all to God. Every chance she
had to trade this world’s money for the food she needed to eat, or the rent she
must pay to stay in whatever hovel she could find; she threw it all in the
box. You can always argue two pennies
will not accomplish anything in God’s ministry.
You can always argue that she would have been better off keeping it,
even Tithing only requires 10 percent of her increase. She clearly has no increase, or miniscule
increase at best. But she gave it all to
God instead of using it on her great need.
Jesus begins by saying “she of her want”. He identifies that she had wants. Not silly wants like we do, looking for the
latest iPhone, or finding the organically grown Goji berries from Nepal. No her wants came from a wholly empty
stomach. Her wants were magnified,
perhaps driven, by pain and discomfort her life was made of. What a small pittance she had earned, and
without savings, and she gave it all to God.
He had no need of it. Why ask her
to give at all. The best use they could
have made of that collection box, was to empty it in her living room, and help
her get her life on track. But that
didn’t happen. She had given her all,
her last ounce of courage, her last measure of devotion, and sum total value
was two pennies.
But was it courage?
Could it be we have this story ALL wrong? Could it be that a widow who had so much
faith as to give God everything she had, was not a widow born of desperation,
but one born of the surety of the love of our God? Jesus called her out to His disciples. But perhaps God had been meeting her needs
and sustaining her life, even if not one of wealth and ease, every day she had
lived it. Perhaps our God had done this
so often for her, as He has done for so many countless servants in scripture,
that there was no doubt in her heart that food would find its way to her
stomach. That shelter would find its way
over her head. Perhaps her certainty of God’s
love, backed by years of history, had dulled the need for courage entirely in
her. She was certain He loved her. She was willing to bet her life on it,
because she already knew He saved her life every day.
When she went hungry, it was not because God was
unaware. A missed meal was not a death
sentence. Nor was a night outside. But to hold back from a God who had sustained
her thus far, to deny Him the life He kept giving to her, was beyond
inconceivable to this widow. She had all
the wealth in the world, for it was all the wealth God had given her. To return it, was nothing more than
recycling. She had that much trust. Lived day to day in His care, putting her
everything in His hands, and knowing His love would not fail her. Abraham put Isaac on the altar only once, I
would wager this widow was in the custom of putting her all in the collection
box. Not to be noticed. Not to achieve salvation, or the goodwill of
God. But because the love of God was all
she would ever need.
Now who is the poor one, and who is the rich one in this
story. It turns out, the widow has more
real wealth than all of us combined. For
she lives in a way of complete dependence none of us are yet willing to emulate
or acknowledge. She could help each of us
out. As we blindly attempt to give her
money, she could teach us that our money is our prison. It binds us to routines to keep it. It tempts us to buy what we do not need, and
hoard what we have not used in years. It
is an albatross around our necks, weighing us down into a world that values
coin over humanity. Its ethics are self
driven. Its principles scream only for
more. Yet we bind ourselves to it, for
fear that without earning a living, we would starve on the street and die. We never trust our God completely; we only
ask for assistance in finding more money to keep us alive. In money we trust, in God we only ask for
help from time to time.
Would that we had the lion’s faith of this widow in the love
of our God. Would that our certainty of
His care was as strong. It has been
there all along. We refuse to recognize
it. We take credit for it. We are not grateful, because we do not
believe He did it for us, we believe we earned it. We believe He setup of a system of earning it
for ourselves, not one of total dependence on Him. Yet here stands the widow’s story in scripture
in stark contrast to our convenient beliefs.
We ask for wealth and blessing in our prayers, never once thinking it
may be our poverty that is our greatest gift from Him. Teaching us dependence may be His greatest
lesson for us. Because it is only through
our weakness that He can be made strong.
While we cling to the illusion of strength, we do nothing but hold off
His blessings, and suffer from anemic faith, and selfish prayers, that
accomplish little. For it is little we
ascribe to Him, and much we ascribe to the power of our careers.
Again I ask, who is the poor one, and who is rich, in the
story of this widow? Her two pennies
were her last full measure of devotion to our God, a gift I cannot equal until
it is my all cast onto that altar. What
is your two cents worth?
No comments:
Post a Comment